Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mark Hodson's avatar

Excellent piece, Lottie, and I'm sure many will agree with you. When I was a full-time travel writer at The Sunday Times I was talking with my editor one day and I used the phrase "churning out articles". She raised an eyebrow archly as if to say: "Have you been doing this too long?"

And, you know what, I think I had. I was about 15 years in, and soon afterwards I transitioned into editing, consulting and running a series of online businesses. Less glamorous, but more interesting.

Maybe the problem is that too many of us hang around too long in a role that is tremendously exciting and enviable, but presents all the challenges you've described. And for all our accumulated knowledge, we can get stale.

Expand full comment
Mike Sowden's avatar

When I was travel writing (mainly travel blogging, but in a scattershot way), conferences were the biggest way to not feel alone. Every time we talked about the big conferences and why we attended them, the top reason was hanging out with 'online people' IRL. This always made me a bit sad, for two reasons: the fact it was clearly so easy to get lonely while travelling the world, and that conferences were still seen as social gatherings much more than incredible resources for learning new skills from the best folk in the business - which they sometimes are, but clearly not as much as they could be?

Another thing about being solitary, though: maybe it can make the job easier? (More freedom to be selfish, to pay attention to everything around you in an undistracted way, and to put yourself through boredom and discomfort in order to get the story you want?) Or - maybe this just isn't true? If not easier, then *different*. I wonder about this a lot, and wonder how much of an unhelpful cliche it is. For example, I have a writer friend with a baby and she's noticed how it's vastly easier for her to talk to strangers now, because everyone wants to say hello to Baby! So maybe this old "lone wolf" model of travel writing can lead to a certain style of travel writing, but it's not necessarily a *better* one, just a different one?

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts